[WARNING: The following may only interest filmmakers or critical thinkers. Basically, I consumed a ridiculous number of awful films that made me seriously consider the production of my own films and others. This is a long rant that is partly analytical, theoretical, critical, philosophical, and self-reflecting.]
This past week marked the end of my pre-screening process for the Ann Arbor Film Festival. Over the last two months, I have watched 320 films, narrative and documentary, that were submitted for consideration in the 48th AAFF which will take place March 23-28, 2010 at The Historic Michigan Theater. Of those 320 films, I recommended approximately 40 to the next round of screening with only five or six films that I really liked- thank you to those few filmmakers.
This long exhaustive process has changed some of my ideas about filmmaking and the types of films I want to make.
First off, I don’t think the majority of filmmakers ever intend to make a bad film. But let’s face it: bad films happen. It’s really hard to make a good film and it takes almost a miracle to make a great film.
Regardless if it awesome or god awful, a majority of films take a lot of time, money, and energy.
So before funds are raised and the camera starts rolling, filmmakers should ask themselves, “Why am I making this film?” It seems self-explanatory but I’m not so sure after watching hundreds of films made within the last year.
After some contemplative thought, I have devised a few main categories that describe the purpose of the filmmaker to participate in film production along with the purpose of the viewer or audience to participate in film consumption. [For this discussion, the filmmaker is the primary person responsible for the creation of the film. The categories can be extended to additional filmmakers and crew members necessary for film production but it is not the primary interest of the discussion.]
These categories are interchangeable in many cases and most filmmakers, films, and viewers have multiple purposes although there may be a primary purpose. For example, the purpose of a film like Farenheit 9/11 may have been political, but it also made a ridiculous amount of money. Who knows whether or not that was Michael Moore's purpose too or just an accidental end?
PURPOSES OF FILMMAKERS AND FILM PRODUCTION
1. Money. The purpose is to make money. The content of the film does not matter. The film can be Citizen Kane or really dirty pornography- as long as it makes money.
2. Entertainment. The purpose is to entertain an audience. The filmmaker may also experience pleasure and amusement in doing so and may experience similar pleasure in the making of the film itself. So there is entertaining the audience, and entertaining oneself. Entertainment can be commercial, artistic or both.
3. Art. The purpose is to explore film as an art form and push its boundaries.
4. Social. The purpose is to explore social issues. It may be the intention to raise audience awareness on the issues at hand. The content of the film can vary from private and personal to global matters. Social factors may also participate in film production and not just the film itself.
5. Political. The purpose is to explore, expose, or propagate political issues. It may be the intention to influence the political views of the audience.
6. Education and Experience. The purpose is to educate an audience. Also, the filmmaker will mostly likely gain knowledge and experience from the production of the film itself.
PURPOSES OF THE VIEWER, AUDIENCE AND FILM CONSUMPTION
1. Entertainment. The purpose is to entertain oneself. The kind of pleasure varies greatly from the type of film, the type of viewer, and the type of consumption. Pleasure may not even be dependent on the film itself, only the type of consumption. For example, teenagers may go to a movie theater to get away from their parents and make-out with their significant others. What is on the screen is insignificant.
2. Art. The purpose is to view film as an art form, see its boundaries being pushed, and enlighten one’s experience and understanding of film and art.
3. Social. The purpose is to gain insight, knowledge and/or understanding of the social issues the film addresses.
4. Political. The purpose is to gain insight, knowledge, and/or understanding of the political issues the film addresses.
5. Educational. The purpose is to gain general knowledge and insight of a particular interest.
VALUE
Each purpose for film production merits a particular value. Value describes the worth, importance, or usefulness of producing a film. Although value is somewhat subjective, most would agree that certain purposes have higher value than others. For example: a documentary may merit social value for raising awareness of a global concern. A simple comedy may merit value in its ability to entertain. Although the latter has an important function in society, one would not argue the greater value of the former.
FILMMAKER EXECUTION AND AUDIENCE RECEPTION
The purpose of filmmakers and film production should be distinguished from the purpose of the film itself. The purpose of the film itself is related to both the filmmaker and audience. If the filmmaker’s efforts are well executed, their purpose may continue with the film itself. For example, if a filmmaker’s primary purpose is to make an entertaining film, and the production of the film is well executed, then the film may be entertaining. There is then the possibility that the film, with its purpose to entertain, may entertain a viewer whose purpose for consuming the film is to be entertained. However, if the production of the film is not well executed, the film may not be entertaining and may not entertain the viewer. If the primary purpose for producing a film is not met by the film itself, it may have little to no value for existence or for an audience.
NARRATIVE AND DOCUMENTARY
Based on quantity and not quality, it seems the primary purpose of most narrative film production is to entertain while the primary purpose of most documentary film is social, political, or educational.
A poorly executed narrative film that does not entertain yields little to no value for its primary purpose of production. However, a poorly executed documentary film that does not adequately engage its topic still seems to yield some value. Perhaps its because the original purpose could be considered of higher value and the act of partaking in a documentary film production raises awareness, however small, to its topic or cause.
VALUE VS. COST
A film’s value should be weighed against its cost. It takes a lot of time, energy, and resources to make a film. If the end product has little to no value, then the film and its production is waste and the filmmaker could be considered wasteful for that matter. Filmmakers with a primary purpose to make money understand this concept quite well: if the cost to produce a film is greater than its revenue, it has lost or wasted money and was not worth the effort.
CONCLUSION
I enjoy nearly all types of films for a variety of reasons. I see value in each purpose of film production and consumption. I do not necessarily think particular genres of films have more value than others. I think creativity determines that. Unfortunately, a majority of narrative films are unoriginal and a waste of time and resources. The only time a cliché melodrama makes me cry is during the end credits, knowing that a lot of money, people and energy were used to create a lot of waste.
I’ve begun to think that I, myself, may have a greater purpose by pursuing documentary filmmaking whereas I once thought I would become a director of narrative features. The lifestyle of a documentary filmmaker seems more engaging, active, and appealing right now. Especially if there are some travel perks...
Who knows what I'll ultimately do or become. I’ve labeled this last section “Conclusion” but I have yet to get to the bottom of anything...
If you bothered to read all of this, thank you! I would appreciate any feedback. If you think this blog post sucks, let me know. I apologize and will try better next time. At least the production of blogs post uses little resources and only wastes my time and yours. If I had produced a film about this instead, I would have wasted several people's time, money, and resources and that would have been devastating.
This long exhaustive process has changed some of my ideas about filmmaking and the types of films I want to make.
First off, I don’t think the majority of filmmakers ever intend to make a bad film. But let’s face it: bad films happen. It’s really hard to make a good film and it takes almost a miracle to make a great film.
Regardless if it awesome or god awful, a majority of films take a lot of time, money, and energy.
So before funds are raised and the camera starts rolling, filmmakers should ask themselves, “Why am I making this film?” It seems self-explanatory but I’m not so sure after watching hundreds of films made within the last year.
After some contemplative thought, I have devised a few main categories that describe the purpose of the filmmaker to participate in film production along with the purpose of the viewer or audience to participate in film consumption. [For this discussion, the filmmaker is the primary person responsible for the creation of the film. The categories can be extended to additional filmmakers and crew members necessary for film production but it is not the primary interest of the discussion.]
These categories are interchangeable in many cases and most filmmakers, films, and viewers have multiple purposes although there may be a primary purpose. For example, the purpose of a film like Farenheit 9/11 may have been political, but it also made a ridiculous amount of money. Who knows whether or not that was Michael Moore's purpose too or just an accidental end?
PURPOSES OF FILMMAKERS AND FILM PRODUCTION
1. Money. The purpose is to make money. The content of the film does not matter. The film can be Citizen Kane or really dirty pornography- as long as it makes money.
2. Entertainment. The purpose is to entertain an audience. The filmmaker may also experience pleasure and amusement in doing so and may experience similar pleasure in the making of the film itself. So there is entertaining the audience, and entertaining oneself. Entertainment can be commercial, artistic or both.
3. Art. The purpose is to explore film as an art form and push its boundaries.
4. Social. The purpose is to explore social issues. It may be the intention to raise audience awareness on the issues at hand. The content of the film can vary from private and personal to global matters. Social factors may also participate in film production and not just the film itself.
5. Political. The purpose is to explore, expose, or propagate political issues. It may be the intention to influence the political views of the audience.
6. Education and Experience. The purpose is to educate an audience. Also, the filmmaker will mostly likely gain knowledge and experience from the production of the film itself.
PURPOSES OF THE VIEWER, AUDIENCE AND FILM CONSUMPTION
1. Entertainment. The purpose is to entertain oneself. The kind of pleasure varies greatly from the type of film, the type of viewer, and the type of consumption. Pleasure may not even be dependent on the film itself, only the type of consumption. For example, teenagers may go to a movie theater to get away from their parents and make-out with their significant others. What is on the screen is insignificant.
2. Art. The purpose is to view film as an art form, see its boundaries being pushed, and enlighten one’s experience and understanding of film and art.
3. Social. The purpose is to gain insight, knowledge and/or understanding of the social issues the film addresses.
4. Political. The purpose is to gain insight, knowledge, and/or understanding of the political issues the film addresses.
5. Educational. The purpose is to gain general knowledge and insight of a particular interest.
VALUE
Each purpose for film production merits a particular value. Value describes the worth, importance, or usefulness of producing a film. Although value is somewhat subjective, most would agree that certain purposes have higher value than others. For example: a documentary may merit social value for raising awareness of a global concern. A simple comedy may merit value in its ability to entertain. Although the latter has an important function in society, one would not argue the greater value of the former.
FILMMAKER EXECUTION AND AUDIENCE RECEPTION
The purpose of filmmakers and film production should be distinguished from the purpose of the film itself. The purpose of the film itself is related to both the filmmaker and audience. If the filmmaker’s efforts are well executed, their purpose may continue with the film itself. For example, if a filmmaker’s primary purpose is to make an entertaining film, and the production of the film is well executed, then the film may be entertaining. There is then the possibility that the film, with its purpose to entertain, may entertain a viewer whose purpose for consuming the film is to be entertained. However, if the production of the film is not well executed, the film may not be entertaining and may not entertain the viewer. If the primary purpose for producing a film is not met by the film itself, it may have little to no value for existence or for an audience.
NARRATIVE AND DOCUMENTARY
Based on quantity and not quality, it seems the primary purpose of most narrative film production is to entertain while the primary purpose of most documentary film is social, political, or educational.
A poorly executed narrative film that does not entertain yields little to no value for its primary purpose of production. However, a poorly executed documentary film that does not adequately engage its topic still seems to yield some value. Perhaps its because the original purpose could be considered of higher value and the act of partaking in a documentary film production raises awareness, however small, to its topic or cause.
VALUE VS. COST
A film’s value should be weighed against its cost. It takes a lot of time, energy, and resources to make a film. If the end product has little to no value, then the film and its production is waste and the filmmaker could be considered wasteful for that matter. Filmmakers with a primary purpose to make money understand this concept quite well: if the cost to produce a film is greater than its revenue, it has lost or wasted money and was not worth the effort.
CONCLUSION
I enjoy nearly all types of films for a variety of reasons. I see value in each purpose of film production and consumption. I do not necessarily think particular genres of films have more value than others. I think creativity determines that. Unfortunately, a majority of narrative films are unoriginal and a waste of time and resources. The only time a cliché melodrama makes me cry is during the end credits, knowing that a lot of money, people and energy were used to create a lot of waste.
I’ve begun to think that I, myself, may have a greater purpose by pursuing documentary filmmaking whereas I once thought I would become a director of narrative features. The lifestyle of a documentary filmmaker seems more engaging, active, and appealing right now. Especially if there are some travel perks...
Who knows what I'll ultimately do or become. I’ve labeled this last section “Conclusion” but I have yet to get to the bottom of anything...
If you bothered to read all of this, thank you! I would appreciate any feedback. If you think this blog post sucks, let me know. I apologize and will try better next time. At least the production of blogs post uses little resources and only wastes my time and yours. If I had produced a film about this instead, I would have wasted several people's time, money, and resources and that would have been devastating.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment